Missed my interview on BrianLehrer Show on WNYC about sibling negative influences & Tsarnaev brothers? Listen here:
http://www.wnyc.org/story/blood-brothers-sibling-influence-crime/
Missed my interview on BrianLehrer Show on WNYC about sibling negative influences & Tsarnaev brothers? Listen here:
http://www.wnyc.org/story/blood-brothers-sibling-influence-crime/
Here’s the link to:
by Caroline Bologna
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/10/national-sibling-day-myths-facts_n_7019548.html
Friday, April 10 is National Siblings Day, a day for the 80 to 90 percent of Americans who have siblings to celebrate their brothers and sisters. Celebrating Siblings Day can be as easy as sending a card, sharing a meal or doing a favor for a sibling.
“There is no relationship like the ones we have with our siblings,” said Montclair State University Family and Child Studies professor, Dr. Jonathan Caspi. A leading expert on sibling relationship dynamics, Caspi is the author of Sibling Aggression Treatment andSibling Development: Implications for Mental Health Practitioners. He has identified five reasons to celebrate Siblings Day:
Created by Claudia Evart, the Siblings Day Foundation established a National Siblings Day, celebrated on April 10, the birthday of Evart’s late sister, Lisette. Since 1998, 85 governors – including former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman – have signed Siblings Day proclamations in 49 states.
For the roughly 20 per cent of Americans who are only children or “singletons,” there is National Only Child Day, which is celebrated onApril 12.
“The advantage of being a singleton is that there is no competition for parental resources,” said Caspi. “This is often an explanation for reported high achievement of only children, who tend to be high achievers like first-borns.”
The downside? “The lack of sibling support, which is so important in resilience and coping.”
A study published in the journal Nature Medicine has reported that in families with two children both diagnosed with autism, they are genetically similar only 30% of the time. Using whole-genome mapping techniques, siblings pairs were different 70% of the time — suggesting they had different “types” of autism. You can read about it in this New York Times article http://nyti.ms/1CIGyM4 and/or in this TIME piece: http://time.com/3683475/autism-siblings-study/
This has implications for treatment of course (e.g., using genome mapping with older siblings to diagnose and treat youngers), but also raises some interesting questions.
First, it calls into question the accuracy and utility of the autism diagnosis. The study’s authors argued that the difference was due to genetic diversity of the disorder. Perhaps it is that the diagnosis is not refined enough. It is too broad and accounts for too great a diversity of behaviors.
Second, there has long been a body of research on typically-developing siblings that shows they are more different than similar. These have focused on psychological and personality differences (not genetics), so a bit comparing apples and oranges, BUT the fact that siblings are more different than similar is no surprise to sibling researchers.
The question then becomes whether or not the same processes that support differences the same in all siblings — pairs diagnosed with autism and pairs who are typically developing.
50 Things I Want for My Little Sister (by Lexi Herrick):
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lexi-herrick/50-things-i-want-for-my-little-sister_b_6334874.html
As an aside, sibling support and positivity are linked to a variety of important developmental and lifelong benefits. Improved sibling relationships results in better lives. – JC